Guidelines for Investigating a Spiritual
Teacher, System or Group
Richard Rose freely acknowledged that more than one
valid path is available for sincere seekers. He quoted the old farmer's
saying that, while there are different paths up the hill, the cows all find
their way to the barn by sundown. His basic guidelines will help seekers
to evaluate a spiritual teacher, spiritual system or spiritual group for their relative worth, and
differentiate those that are genuine from those that are false or deficient.
John Kent, Ph.D., authored a dissertation titled
Psychology of the
Observer: The Path to Reality Through the Self (Kent 1990). Kent documented 15
categories that
Rose recommended we use when investigating a spiritual teacher, system or group.
Be wary and attentive if you answer "
yes" to any of the following
questions:
1) Simplicity: Does the group present its ideas in a mass of unwieldy,
complex logic‑structures or arcane symbology, when simpler explanations about life might do?
2) Inflexibility: Is there a guru you must worship, clothes you must
wear, rituals you must practice, or dogma you must accept?
3) Sensibility: Does the system [lack] appeal to
your common sense and intuition?
4) Sexual morality: Does the teaching [discourage] the necessity
for the healthy, moral correction and sublimation of the sex function?
5) Pure motives: Does the teaching flatter
your ego, excuse your laziness, condone your hedonism, encourage your appetite
for power, or provide false comfort against the insecurity of honest ignorance?
6) Existential integrity: Does the teaching substitute concept‑building
for experiential discovery, or attempt to use bodily means to attain a non‑physical
immortality?
7) Exclusivity: Does the group insist that they are the sole
possessors of the only path to the truth or that the guru is uniquely qualified
to save people, and suggest that leaving the group is thus an affront to God?
8) Bureaucracy: Is the organization highly regimented, with a
hierarchy of power within it that keeps the members subservient or leaves
room for one to be tempted to ascend through continued involvement?
9) Priorities: Is the purpose of the group more geared
towards social interaction, political activism, or business networking
than inner work?
10) Methodology: Does the system promote mechanical, repetitive
practices to induce a mood of quiescence or the presumption of incremental progress,
or meditation techniques of self‑hypnosis, rather than encouraging lucid efforts at
self‑knowledge and genuine mindfulness?
11) Secrecy: Is the group secretive in its activities, appealing to
some childish ego, or does the teaching promise to contain tantalizing secrets
within secrets that require a succession of mysterious initiations to acquire
before its real meaning can be revealed, thereby making one superior to those
without such knowledge, or is the truth told plainly to whomever can hear it and
act on it?
12) Theatrics: Is the emphasis more on paraphernalia (incense,
music, robes, displays), ritual (ceremonies, Masses, movements), and symbolism
(tarot, astrology, kabbalah, etc.) than on simple, direct communication of
guidance in proper introspection and righteous living?
13) Dependency: Is the group or a charismatic leader
sternly presented as the necessary intermediary between the seeker and
God?
14) Cost: [Are you] required to pay an excessive amount
of money to participate in the group, receive instruction, talk with the
guru, etc., beyond whatever reasonable amount is necessary to pay for
books, room rentals, mailings, and such? Do they say the truth
will set you free, but charge you for the privilege?
15) Fatigue: Did you accept the teaching or group
because you were too tired to go on looking?
Remember, unshakeable determination to find the right
teacher, system or group will maintain your "vulnerability to Grace."
Want more valuable guidelines? Read
Tips for
Evaluating a Spiritual Teacher from SpiritualTeachers.org.
Home About
Download Contact Us
Help
Search

©2003-2008 SearchWithin.org. All rights reserved.